Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
We begin with Daniel Andrews' biggest lie. For over a decade, he and wife Catherine Kesik claimed 15-year-old Ryan Meuleman "T-boned" their SUV. But in a recently obtained 000 call, Andrews can be clearly heard admitting, "WE'VE HIT HIM." This admission is supported by previously hidden police photos that show front-end damage to the SUV, including a smashed windscreen and broken right side-mirror, proving the Andrews SUV struck Ryan.
Daniel Andrews gave a sworn statement to police claiming that he called 000 immediately after the crash. But, 000 call logs reveal he waited over six minutes before making the call. Meanwhile, a neighbour spoke to 000 at least two minutes earlier. Of all Daniel Andrews’ lies, this one is the most chilling
Recent media coverage shows Daniel Andrews dodging questions about his bombshell 000 call admission: "We've hit him." Andrews' silence speaks volumes—he’s clearly worried about the legal consequences of this admission.
Police reports initially said that both Andrews and Kesik were breathalysed at the scene. It was later revealed that police lied, and no breath tests were conducted. Police were then caught altering the reports after the lie was uncovered.
Daniel Andrews has repeatedly claimed that the incident was thoroughly investigated by police. But, neither he nor his wife were ever formally investigated, and crucial steps—such as impounding the damaged vehicle for forensic analysis—never took place.
Two witnesses stated that Daniel Andrews left the crash site and walked 250 metres to his rented holiday house, before returning later after police and an ambulance had arrived. Andrews has lied about this in his accounts, proving he failed to remain at the scene and render assistance.
In his 000 call, Daniel Andrews claimed he couldn’t see if Ryan was bleeding. But a witness told 000 that Ryan was visibly bleeding through his t-shirt. This raises questions about whether Daniel Andrews was even at the crash scene when he was talking to the 000 operator.
The government-issued SUV Daniel Andrews drove away after the crash had a smashed windscreen, front-end damage and missing a side-view mirror, rendering it unroadworthy. Police failed to impound this vehicle or conduct a forensic examination.
Even in a crisis, it usually takes just 10 to 15 seconds to call 000. Yet neither Daniel Andrews nor Catherine Kesik—both with mobile phones—did so immediately. The victim recalls the couple arguing for what felt like several minutes. Notably, Kesik—the (unconfirmed) nominated driver in the police report—never made the call.
When Andrews finally called—around 6.5 minutes after the crash—he couldn’t tell the operator whether his wife, standing just metres away, was also calling. If he was truly only 10 metres from her, he would have seen it.
This raises serious questions about their actions—and about where Andrews really was during those critical moments.
Daniel Andrews and Catherine Kesik have never been investigated over the crash. Instead, the only investigation focused on the two attending officers—Senior Constable Shayna Sage and Constable Daniel Ward—who failed to breathalyse Catherine Andrews and falsified their reports to suggest they had.
When caught in their lies, they amended the reports. Yet rather than facing consequences for this sackable and criminal offence, they were let off with a warning—and later promoted.
Victoria Police must launch a full and transparent investigation into the new evidence, even if it exposes corruption within their own ranks.
Under Victorian law, Daniel and Catherine Andrews should face charges including perjury (for providing false statements to police), failure to render assistance (a breach of duty in serious accidents), reckless conduct endangering life and destroying evidence, like driving the SUV away.
Police could face charges for misconduct in public office, falsifying evidence, and obstruction of justice, particularly in relation to altering reports, failing to conduct proper investigations, and suppressing key evidence like the 000 call and crash photos.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.